Where is his record of being cool under pressure, of being able to handle high pressure and intense situations? If Mike Brown really was charging him, full tilt at a 90 degree angle, how were Officer Wilson’s head shots so precise? One head shot would have stopped Mike Brown dead, so how did the second one go so neatly into his skull as well?
Where is Officer Wilson’s record of range time? Where are his targets that can show what kind of grouping he can shoot in a calm environment? Where are his speed shooting range tests? Can Officer Wilson demonstrate how he held his gun in the same position shooting twice in a row quickly enough to put two bullets into Mike Brown’s head?
Just reviewed the autopsy report, one of the head shots struck him in the right eye, or at least the face, as far as I can tell, which is not conducive with the story of Mike Brown charging Officer Wilson, unless his head was tilted up while his body was tilted forward. The shot to the top of the skull is supposed to be the shot that ended Mike Brown’s life, so how did those other four shots to his right arm get there?
Eyewitness testimony may be a little shaky as to whether Mike Brown was facing or had his back to Officer Wilson, but they all corroborate that he had his hands up at the time he was murdered.
Mike Brown’s fist also did not show any signs of having punched Officer Wilson in the face (unless you are constantly in fights with people, punching someone in the face really fucking hurts your hand), and there were no signs of struggle in the autopsy report. Where are the bruises on Officer Wilson’s face? If he was really punched in the face, wouldn’t he have wanted to prove that? Why is Officer Wilson in hiding? Why have no images of him been released? Why do we have an autopsy report on Mike Brown but no report on Officer Wilson’s recovery from his alleged injuries?
Why don’t we put the killer on trial here instead of the victim? Mike Brown is dead. He cannot defend himself.
my dad died from ALS when i was 3 years old. he was 36. my mom was 33. that was 30 years ago. now i’m the same age my mom was when my dad died. and there is still no cure for ALS.
this is what happens when you have ALS: your muscles slowly stop working, one part at a time. for my dad, first he couldn’t use one of his hands. then his arm. then the other arm. then he couldn’t walk. then he couldn’t stand up. then he couldn’t talk. then he couldn’t swallow. then he couldn’t breathe. then he was dead.
this all took about two years. he was diagnosed when i was about one year old. the only memories i have about my dad are of an inert body in a wheelchair or lying in a bed with a bunch of tubes stuck into it. as i was learning to talk, he was losing the ability to speak. as i was learning to walk, he stopped being able to move. my mom often had to choose between who she was going to help go to the bathroom at any given moment: her husband or her toddler.
after my dad died, my mom took over the philadelphia chapter of the ALS association. it consisted of a shoebox full of notecards with names on it. now it is a multi-million dollar organization with a large staff. she is still in charge. my mom is one of the most amazing people on the planet, basically.
these past couple weeks have been mind-boggling. i have openly wept watching so many of these videos. i still don’t completely get how all of this has happened, but now we live in a world in which lil wayne and taylor swift and oprah and justin timberlake and weird al and bill gates talk about ALS. my mom just emailed me this sentence: “lebron james ice bucket challenge.” i mean, IS THIS REAL LIFE?! i just keep saying over and over: holy shit. holy shit. holy shit.
so far, it has raised over 10 million dollars… and counting. my mom has spent every single day of her life for the past three decades trying to get this kind of attention and funds for this disease.
i don’t care if it’s a stupid gimmick. i don’t care if people are just doing this because it’s trendy or because they want pats on the back. i don’t care if it’s the new harlem shake. i don’t care if for the rest of my life, when i talk about ALS, i have to say “you know, the ice bucket disease.”
please, everybody, please keep pouring buckets of ice over your heads. please keep donating money. please keep talking about this.
my mom’s chapter:
YOU ARE GOING TO NEED TO DO A BIGGER GOOGLE SEARCH MY FRIEND AND REALIZE BLACK PANTHER IS ONE OF THE MOST PROMINENT POC SUPER HEROES IN THE MARVEL UNIVERSE AND TO HAVE HIM PLAYED BY ANYTHING BUT WOULD BE A MISTAKE. I AM SORRY I AM YELLING AT YOU BUT THIS IS A BIG DEAL.
I SWEAR TO GOD IF FUCKING BENEDICT CUMBERBATCH PLAYS T’CHALLA I WILL HURT SOMEBODY YALL HAVE NO IDEA
"without us you wouldn’t have any rights!" without you we wouldn’t have to fight for them
Always this. Always.
"Remember that men gave women the right to vote!"
And remember that men should never have been at such a social and political advantage as to be able to literally give and take away rights from groups of people.
If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.
Hate to break it, but this is more done by other women than men.
Guys are mostly differently awful.
- there are mountains of research backing up the fact that advertisers and media prey on women’s insecurities
- like the rest of media ]and the world, basically], the ad industry is run by men. so is the beauty industry [the ceo’s of elizabeth arden, l’oreal, ulta, revlon, paul mitchell, nars, the miss universe pageant and several others are men].
men are the driving force behind media that is toxic to women and they are the ones who profit off of it.
on the ground, it may appear that women are the ones doing this to each other. that is a result of internalized misogyny, which women at times perpetuate due to the pressure to perform in a patriarchal society.
but do not think for a moment that women are behind this entire industry. do not think that women are the reason for this, do not think that women profit off of this, and do not think that mothers want this for their daughters.
There exists a sub-section of men who literally cannot sit through a discussion of structural misogyny without receiving constant and emphatic reassurance that no one is accusing them personally of being a misogynist. This is a derail and an attempt to shut down debate. Because, to quote “Sometimes, it’s just a cigar”:
“Suppose you disagree with women about whether rape is part of the structure of our society, used to reinforce patriarchy. Do you make that debate possible by standing on your wounded pride, and just insisting that the debate must start with a disclaimer that says you’re not a rapist? Forgive me, but that’s nothing more than narcissism.”
The conviction that you have never participated or been complicit in structural misogyny is dubious to say the least, no matter what your gender. But even if you are resolute that you, personally, have managed to transcend the system you were born and raised in and now stand as a shining beacon of gender equity outside the mire of patriarchy? Good for you, but structural misogyny still exists and we still need to have a conversation about it. If you think you have nothing to learn, go play elsewhere on the internet.